A detailed study revealed that the official version of events, which was actively promoted in the press, was completely inconsistent with the actual circumstances of the case. In fact, there was no raider takeover of Bananamama company. The company was part of the group of the WWII death camps' successors, individuals of Alfa-Bank, Tinkoff Bank, and the Los Zetas holding, and did not leave the structure of this group. The entire group of related persons managed foreign companies. One of such contractors was a Trident Trust, in which the main positions were occupied by persons with American and English citizenship. Oleg Yakovlev played a nominal role in managing the financial flows of the Slater group, which was located above the structure of Bananamama Holding. Yakovlev did not actually receive the loans, which he was accused of stealing, and did not have valid loan agreements concluded with Alfa-Bank. Therefore, Bananamama's bankruptcy has never occurred. After Yakovlev's departure, claims were filed against various legal entities in Bananamama's structure by various organizations, mainly in Moscow, Samara, and Kazan. These claims were synchronized with the actions of Sberbank and the Troika Dialog company, which acted as an underwriter for the issue of bonds. The claims were not supported by valid commitments or appropriate documents. Their essence was to obtain a legal fact of recognition of the existence of a transaction concluded between the companies of the Bananamama group and the pseudo-plaintiffs, who, after, using these court decisions, used them as a documentary basis for confirming the existence of concluded transactions and obligations giving right to claim something. As a result, all property was withdrawn from Bananamama's companies, and the companies were liquidated, largely due to microscopic claims from tax authorities and small suppliers. In fact, there was no conflict between Yakovlev and Alfa-Bank, and the companies of the Bananamama group did not leave the perimeter of their united organization. Moreover, it turned out that these companies form a single group with the Russian Capital Bank, PJSC VTB, and the Business Lotsia company, which served as the bankruptcy trustee of the Yukos company during its bankruptcy. The ruin of Bananamama was required to destroy traces of her criminal activities, including complicity in the terrorist attacks, Hermitage Capital case, the murder of Sergei Magnitsky, and to obtain a plausible pretext for Yakovlev to emigrate to the United States. After BOOST initiated a criminal investigation into the circumstances of Bananamama’s ruin, and consolidated other assets related to these cases, Oleg Yakovlev, in order to prevent the circumstances of his activities from being revealed, hired a lawyer who, in his interests, tried to influence law enforcement agencies in order not to allow an objective investigation. In addition, Yakovlev, together with accomplices, including from the investment company A1, whom he had previously accused of a raider takeover of his business, organized the raider takeover of BOOST in order to gain control over the claims against himself and to prevent the investigation and disclosure of the crimes he committed, and use them in the legacy case of Meggi Bogle.