top of page
Writer's pictureMeggi Bogle

Battle on the Krupskaya Bulge

Battle on the Krupskaya Bulge.

Garavito/Pope. Mark Rich Reich /3rd Reich.

February 17th, 2024

šŸŽ¬As per Parens (1996), "Discussions of information produced by genetics research are often guided by two mistaken theoretical moves. Enthusiasts tell us not to worry because genetic tinkering can alter only our body, never our soul; worriers suggest that discovering links between our behavior and our different bodies threatens important democratic ideas like moral equality. If we understand the body and soul to be inseparable and equality to be undiminished by difference, we can begin to take seriously the information produced by genetics research." Davis (1975) argued, that the genes which are inherited are interacting with the environment, however, the biological and behavioral traits are inherited, that, in terms of the social determinism, represented the issue how to evaluate the results of genetic research. Modern science has less problems with it directly stating that the genes appearing as our phenotype, representing the summary of the traits obtained by us as a summary of the genes in our DNA. Our genetic legacy includes not only the color of hairs, or a form of the nose, the genes reflect, how do we behave, and predefine our intelligence, self-efficacy, beliefs, attitude, and, for sure, our biology that predetermines at the molecular level how do we act. Yes, fathers matter. But, not fathers only.


People outstanding in talent and intelligence have many times more relatives among outstanding people than would be expected with the random distribution of these abilities (Bulaeva, 1991).

In the famous novel The Dog's Heart," professor Preobrazhebsky said:" Why shall we clone people when any woman can give birth to one more Spinoza at any time." However, it is not the case, because any woman can't give birth to Spinoza, or Leo Tolstoy, Hermann Gƶring, Prince Volkonsky, Riga's Governor Prince Repnin, Queen Victory, General Raevsky, King Friedrich The Great, and many other people of the same kind. Researches show, that the behavioral traits represent the integral elements of the phenotype, together with the biological properties that influence the anatomy and certain physiological processes also affecting the human behavior, like neural system, hormonal system, and so on. It's obvious, that the quality of outstanding - extraordinarily good or extraordinarily bad traits - adhere the same laws of inheritance. Simplifying the explanation, to be born as a serial murderer, it has to be genetically conditioned. Healthy human with healthy genome never become a serial murderer. Consequently, the reflected traits of the phenotype of the Sam's son, clearly explaining the genotype of his father Sam. Vice versa, the reflected phenotype of the father, can easily show what we could expect from his son. The further conclusion is very clear and perfectly explains the personality of Sam and his daddy. If Sam is a serial murderer, his parents are genetically conditioned serial murderers. If both, Sam and his son are serial murderers, this characteristic is probably may be inherited by the sex-linked dominant type. But as long as we do not know who is the mother yet, we can't make a conclusion that being a serial murderer is sex-linked inherited trait. However, we can identify many exterior and pathophysiology traits in the phenotype, which are observed in the serial murderers, to build the typical profile of the serial murderer's phenotype and undertake the opposite exercise - to build the genotype's template for the serial murderer. Based on these assumptions, we can:

  • Trace the kinship

  • Identify relatives (by matching phenotypes and associated genotypes)

  • Make the conclusion about the expected genetically explained behavior, cognitive activity, and intelligence.

For instance, oligophrenia is the form of the family illnesses and genetically explained pathologies. Like any other genetic pathology, to give birth an oligophrene is impossible for the healthy family without these genetic pathologies. Never downs, mentally retarded, or serial killers are born in the genetically healthy family. Thus, the main idea is that the kids inherit the phenotype and genotype of their parents, and the behaviour, intelligence, talents, extraordinary traits, both good or bad, are inherited. In contradiction to the statement of professor Preobrazhensky, Albert Einstein can be born only in the family of similarly talented people, like himself. In the family of hereditary serial murderers, the serial murderer only can be born. And, the father-pedophile, genetically conditioned serial murderer and poisoner, with the distinctive pathologies in exterior, can give birth to a son of the same kind. Of course, by a magical coincidence, when dad and son are not the same person.

The inherited phenotype contains many distinctive traits, not all of them can be easily traceable. For instance, visual-spatial linguistic communication is a specific type of our intelligence, which is inherited like any other traits.

Capability to communicate by using this language's method, is an inherited trait. As a part of ritual murders, organised crime, or terrorism, visual-spatial language became to play the two major roles. The first one was a secured communication with the victims and inside the criminal group to deliver the message attributed to the concrete crime to the recipients. The second one was the integral part of any serial crime due to the specific of the brain's reward system functioning. The serial crimes are committed by the individuals having the definite brain pathologies: the dopamine addiction when the satisfaction gained as a result of the overdose of the dopamine extracted during the criminal activity. Thus, the serial criminals get pleasure as a result of criminal activity. However, as soon as the highest doses of dopamine are extracted during the phase before the crime committment itself: invention, planning, organisation, as more complicated the ritual, as longer and brighter the pleasure that the criminal feels. In the organised criminal groups, and especially of the terroristic nature the ritual's execution serves as a communication to translate the message: why the crime was committed, who did that, and why this victim was chosen. The conclusion is very simple. The visual-spatial language is widely distributed in totalitarian organisations with the strong hierarchy. The main examples of it are organised crime, military and law enforcement, and religion.

To discover the whole topic, It is necessary to draw the waterline segregating the ritual murder from the ritual human sacrifice. Both had a century of history, but very different in terms of motivation, method, subjects, and ritual. The major difference is that in ritual human sacrifice, this murder is dedicated to the highest substance, whilst the ritual murder has other objectives, without the dedication of the killing to someone. One of the most actively used ritual murders nations was a Roman. On the territory of modern Italy, close to Coliseum, where the Roman forums are located, there were saved the remains of the destructed cathedrals of Ishida, and other gods. However, as noted by Schultz (2010), the committed rituals of the murder even contained the reference to the sacrifiction, did not attribute this to the certain god. Schultz noted: "the Romans, even though more often than not, they do not identify the recipient of the sacrifices they made. Most often they did not record at all, noting only who sacrificed and what was offered."

In Russia, there is a story that you can conquer a woman in one of two ways: to beat her heart with a precious stone, or a real eye. Knowledgeable wise people say that the eye is better after all. In the same way, you can conquer the heart of even the Pope, just reminding him who he is in Colombia.

No matter how you put on the beast, it will remain a beast.


Follow:


Credits:

  1. Photos: gettyimage.de

  2. Bulaeva, K. (1991). Fundamentals of human genetic psychophysiology. Moscow, 'Science.'

  3. Yavkin, V. (1974). Family forms of oligophrenia. Tashkent. Publishing house "Medicine."



2 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

ComentƔrios


bottom of page